0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
HE damage (avg/round)
11.93.4
Player score (round)
36821012
Player score (round)
37011012
Player score (round)
37121012
Player score (round)
34721012
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Overpass
40%
Mirage
29%
Vertigo
24%
Nuke
13%
Dust II
7%
Ancient
4%
Inferno
3%
Last 5 maps
Overpass
40%
15
10
Mirage
67%
12
4
Vertigo
33%
6
16
Nuke
27%
15
20
Dust II
25%
4
25
Ancient
33%
9
15
Inferno
41%
22
3
Last 5 maps
Overpass
0%
0
27
Mirage
38%
16
3
Vertigo
57%
7
1
Nuke
14%
7
9
Dust II
18%
11
8
Ancient
29%
7
6
Inferno
44%
16
3
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of ATK vs ONET4P by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between ATK and ONET4P, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Vertigo, Mirage, and victory was secured by ONET4P. The MVP of this match was motm.
ONET4P analytics
The team ONET4P secured 38 out of 71 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Vertigo, Mirage. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for ONET4P were walker contributed 56 kills and Fr3nk1e contributed 57 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 27252 overall damage.
On the defensive side, ONET4P held their ground firmly, successfully defending 21 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
ATK analytics
The team ATK managed to secure 33 out of 71 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 4 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for ATK were motm contributed 62 kills and truth contributed 58 kills. 27219 of total damage by ATK could not prevent ONET4P from securing the victory
On the defensive side, ATK struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 18 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments