ATK Scoreboard Anubis (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

22

16

7

+6

91

4:5

5

0

6.8

+17%

19

20

5

-1

84

3:2

4

0

6.0

-8%

18

18

3

0

69

2:6

6

0

5.7

-10%

13

16

6

-3

49

1:1

3

0

5.0

-23%

14

19

3

-5

58

1:3

5

0

4.8

-19%

Total

86

89

24

-3

350

11:17

23

0

5.7

-9%

MIBR Scoreboard Anubis (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

MVP

25

17

10

+8

110

2:0

5

1

7.7

+20%

22

18

2

+4

74

7:2

6

0

6.7

-2%

16

18

2

-2

69

2:2

4

1

5.9

-3%

15

14

4

+1

60

3:1

4

0

5.6

-8%

11

19

3

-8

46

3:6

3

0

4.7

-28%

Total

89

86

21

+3

358

17:11

22

2

6.1

-4%

Teams advantage Anubis (M1)
Info
Map Analysis of ATK vs MIBR by the Bo3.gg Team

ATK on Anubis Analysis

ATK demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 16 out of 28 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for ATK on Anubis were MisteM, who contributed 22 kills, and Swisher, who added 19 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 9804 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Anubis, ATK held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


MIBR on Anubis Analysis

Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for MIBR, as they managed to secure 12 out of 28 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for MIBR on Anubis included JOTA, who contributed 25 kills, and HEN1, who added 22 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 9963 total damage, MIBR couldn't prevent ATK from securing victory on Anubis


On the defensive side of Anubis, MIBR struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date