0 Comments
Teams advantage
Score
6.5
6.6
Mirage0
Win Rounds
9
13
Mirage4
Kills
83
82
Mirage-1
Damage
8.94K
8.73K
Mirage-209
Economy
451.8K
425.25K
Mirage-26550
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Trades on a map
9.93.4638
Assists on a map
114.4098
Speed Round (sec)
00:15s01:55s
Speed Round (sec)
00:25s01:55s
Damage (total/round)
39373
Player score (round)
45471011
Damage (total/round)
40073
Damage (total/round)
41873
Player score (round)
35021011
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
67%
Ancient
0%
Anubis
0%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
0%
1
0
Ancient
50%
2
0
Anubis
100%
1
0
Last 5 maps
Mirage
67%
3
0
Ancient
50%
2
0
Anubis
100%
1
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wwwll
- lwlwl
Info
Match analysis of arktos esports vs MCS by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between arktos esports and MCS, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Mirage, and victory was secured by MCS. The MVP of this match was mishani.
MCS analytics
The team MCS secured 13 out of 22 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for MCS were Scorchyy contributed 26 kills and ogura contributed 16 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 8729 overall damage.
On the defensive side, MCS held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
arktos esports analytics
The team arktos esports managed to secure 9 out of 22 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for arktos esports were mishani contributed 24 kills and Locke contributed 19 kills. 8938 of total damage by arktos esports could not prevent MCS from securing the victory
On the defensive side, arktos esports struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments