0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Galil kills on a map
41.8064
Galil damage (avg/round)
18.25.6
Flash duration on a map (sec)
01:44s00:39s
Flash blinded on a map (opp)
8330
M4A1 kills on a map
104.6963
M4A1 damage (avg/round)
5216.7
AK47 kills on a map
156.732
Smoke thrown on a map
2015.0371
Molotov damage (avg/round)
92
Trades on a map
9.463.5084
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
73%
Overpass
70%
Nuke
50%
Vertigo
23%
Dust II
12%
Ancient
5%
Inferno
2%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
73%
15
2
Overpass
0%
0
25
Nuke
25%
8
8
Vertigo
73%
11
3
Dust II
30%
10
10
Ancient
75%
8
4
Inferno
53%
15
12
Last 5 maps
Mirage
0%
0
13
Overpass
70%
10
5
Nuke
75%
16
1
Vertigo
50%
4
12
Dust II
42%
12
3
Ancient
70%
10
5
Inferno
55%
11
3
Info
Match analysis of Sharks vs ARCTIC by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Sharks and ARCTIC, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Dust II, and victory was secured by ARCTIC. The MVP of this match was piriajr.
ARCTIC analytics
The team ARCTIC secured 15 out of 21 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Dust II. They also successfully set 1 bombs during the match.
The standout players for ARCTIC were piriajr contributed 26 kills and history contributed 21 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 9389 overall damage.
On the defensive side, ARCTIC held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Sharks analytics
The team Sharks managed to secure 6 out of 21 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Sharks were zevy contributed 17 kills and Lucaozy contributed 16 kills. 8461 of total damage by Sharks could not prevent ARCTIC from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Sharks struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments