Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Shots accuracy (%)
41%18%
AWP kills on a map
176.5798
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
HE damage (total/round)
9726.8
Flash duration on a round (sec)
00:16s00:05s
M4A1 damage (avg/round)
47.816.7
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4398
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
12.33.8
Flash duration on a map (sec)
01:22s00:39s
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
67%
Overpass
27%
Dust II
23%
Nuke
20%
Ancient
9%
Inferno
8%
Mirage
8%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
67%
9
14
Overpass
82%
17
9
Dust II
50%
18
4
Nuke
59%
22
4
Ancient
71%
17
5
Inferno
50%
16
8
Mirage
50%
2
23
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
0
35
Overpass
55%
11
12
Dust II
73%
15
9
Nuke
79%
14
3
Ancient
80%
5
21
Inferno
42%
12
13
Mirage
58%
12
3
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of ARCTIC vs 9z by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between ARCTIC and 9z, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Nuke, Inferno, and victory was secured by 9z. The MVP of this match was max.
9z analytics
The team 9z secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke, Inferno. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for 9z were max contributed 46 kills and rox contributed 36 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 19085 overall damage.
On the defensive side, 9z held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
ARCTIC analytics
The team ARCTIC managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for ARCTIC were history contributed 37 kills and short contributed 31 kills. 14963 of total damage by ARCTIC could not prevent 9z from securing the victory
On the defensive side, ARCTIC struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments