0 Comments
73
88
23
-15
316
9:17
17
2
-10%
Teams advantage Inferno (M3)
Records Inferno
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Smoke thrown on a map
2615.0371
HE damage (avg/round)
14.23.4
M4A4 kills on a map
103.6448
HE damage (avg/round)
11.33.4
Flash duration on a map (sec)
01:40s00:39s
Smoke thrown on a map
2715.0371
Player score (round)
35741012
HE damage (total/round)
8926.8
HE damage (total/round)
13026.8
Flash duration on a round (sec)
00:15s00:05s
Info
Map Analysis of Apeks vs ex-Copenhagen Flames by the Bo3.gg Team
Apeks on Inferno Analysis
Apeks demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 26 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Apeks on Inferno were nawwk, who contributed 25 kills, and kyxsan, who added 18 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 9506 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, Apeks held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
ex-Copenhagen Flames on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for ex-Copenhagen Flames, as they managed to secure 10 out of 26 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for ex-Copenhagen Flames on Inferno included TMB, who contributed 17 kills, and b0RUP, who added 16 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8211 total damage, ex-Copenhagen Flames couldn't prevent Apeks from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, ex-Copenhagen Flames struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments