0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Lineups
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Lineup
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
80%
Ancient
54%
Inferno
23%
Nuke
19%
Mirage
12%
Overpass
4%
Vertigo
3%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
0
32
Ancient
54%
13
3
Inferno
73%
15
6
Nuke
41%
17
17
Mirage
76%
17
3
Overpass
64%
14
3
Vertigo
56%
9
18
Last 5 maps
Dust II
80%
15
2
Ancient
0%
1
60
Inferno
50%
32
17
Nuke
60%
25
16
Mirage
64%
22
16
Overpass
60%
15
20
Vertigo
53%
32
7
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lwwww
- wlwll
Info
Match analysis of Apeks vs Eternal Fire by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Apeks and Eternal Fire, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Nuke, and victory was secured by Apeks. The MVP of this match was STYKO.
Apeks analytics
The team Apeks secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Apeks were STYKO contributed 23 kills and nawwk contributed 22 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 10187 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Apeks held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Eternal Fire analytics
The team Eternal Fire managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Eternal Fire were imoRR contributed 22 kills and xfl0ud contributed 13 kills. 7810 of total damage by Eternal Fire could not prevent Apeks from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Eternal Fire struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments