0 Comments
Teams advantage Nuke (M1)
Records Nuke
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
80%
Ancient
54%
Inferno
23%
Nuke
19%
Mirage
12%
Overpass
4%
Vertigo
3%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
0
32
Ancient
54%
13
3
Inferno
73%
15
6
Nuke
41%
17
17
Mirage
76%
17
3
Overpass
64%
14
3
Vertigo
56%
9
18
Last 5 maps
Dust II
80%
15
2
Ancient
0%
1
60
Inferno
50%
32
17
Nuke
60%
25
16
Mirage
64%
22
16
Overpass
60%
15
20
Vertigo
53%
32
7
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lwwww
- wlwll
Info
Map Analysis of Apeks vs Eternal Fire by the Bo3.gg Team
Apeks on Nuke Analysis
Apeks demonstrated their prowers on Nuke, securing 16 out of 25 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Apeks on Nuke were STYKO, who contributed 23 kills, and nawwk, who added 22 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Nuke, the team inflicted a total of 10187 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Nuke, Apeks held their ground firmly, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Eternal Fire on Nuke Analysis
Nuke proved to be a challenging battleground for Eternal Fire, as they managed to secure 9 out of 25 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Eternal Fire on Nuke included imoRR, who contributed 22 kills, and xfl0ud, who added 13 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7810 total damage, Eternal Fire couldn't prevent Apeks from securing victory on Nuke
On the defensive side of Nuke, Eternal Fire struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments