Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:35s01:28s
Smoke thrown on a map
2315.0791
Speed Round (sec)
00:30s01:54s
Player score (round)
40951012
Damage (total/round)
40973
Player score (round)
36121012
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
68%
Inferno
67%
Vertigo
22%
Ancient
12%
Mirage
10%
Overpass
8%
Anubis
5%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
0%
0
49
Inferno
67%
21
10
Vertigo
53%
15
17
Ancient
50%
24
3
Mirage
55%
22
6
Overpass
37%
19
18
Anubis
61%
18
4
Last 5 maps
Nuke
68%
19
3
Inferno
0%
0
34
Vertigo
75%
12
9
Ancient
62%
13
3
Mirage
45%
11
12
Overpass
45%
11
12
Anubis
56%
16
1
Info
Match analysis of Apeks vs ENCE by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Apeks and ENCE, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Anubis, Vertigo, and victory was secured by Apeks. The MVP of this match was nawwk.
Apeks analytics
The team Apeks secured 26 out of 44 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis, Vertigo. They also successfully set 6 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Apeks were nawwk contributed 41 kills and CacaNito contributed 33 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 16105 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Apeks held their ground firmly, successfully defending 14 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
ENCE analytics
The team ENCE managed to secure 18 out of 44 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for ENCE were SunPayus contributed 37 kills and gla1ve contributed 30 kills. 16338 of total damage by ENCE could not prevent Apeks from securing the victory
On the defensive side, ENCE struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments