0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:35s01:30s
Smoke thrown on a map
2415.0373
M4A4 kills on a map
113.6419
M4A4 damage (avg/round)
3612.7
Molotov damage (avg/round)
7.72
Damage (total/round)
40073
Damage (total/round)
39873
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
38%
Anubis
36%
Ancient
16%
Overpass
14%
Inferno
10%
Mirage
6%
Vertigo
4%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
0%
0
65
Anubis
77%
26
4
Ancient
66%
32
9
Overpass
59%
22
15
Inferno
65%
31
23
Mirage
56%
25
14
Vertigo
40%
20
29
Last 5 maps
Nuke
38%
24
18
Anubis
41%
22
14
Ancient
50%
12
36
Overpass
73%
15
21
Inferno
55%
29
18
Mirage
50%
26
5
Vertigo
44%
18
19
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of Apeks vs BIG by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Apeks and BIG, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Mirage, and victory was secured by Apeks. The MVP of this match was tabseN.
Apeks analytics
The team Apeks secured 16 out of 26 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Apeks were jkaem contributed 25 kills and STYKO contributed 18 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 9793 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Apeks held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
BIG analytics
The team BIG managed to secure 10 out of 26 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 2 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for BIG were tabseN contributed 18 kills and S3NSEY contributed 17 kills. 9485 of total damage by BIG could not prevent Apeks from securing the victory
On the defensive side, BIG struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments