Teams advantage
Score
6.2
6.2
Anubis0
Win Rounds
10
13
Anubis3
Kills
77
83
Anubis6
Damage
8.54K
9.12K
Anubis576
Economy
473.65K
443.6K
Anubis-30050
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4482
Speed Round (sec)
00:24s01:55s
Player score (round)
37191010
Player score (round)
34871010
Damage (total/round)
39973
Player score (round)
38351010
Player score (round)
45771010
Player score (round)
35151010
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Ancient
100%
Anubis
67%
Vertigo
0%
Last 5 maps
Ancient
0%
1
0
Anubis
33%
3
0
Vertigo
0%
1
0
Last 5 maps
Ancient
100%
1
0
Anubis
100%
1
0
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wllll
- w
Info
Match analysis of Amped vs HeadShotKings by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Amped and HeadShotKings, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Anubis, and victory was secured by HeadShotKings. The MVP of this match was Bones.
HeadShotKings analytics
The team HeadShotKings secured 13 out of 23 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis. They also successfully set 3 bombs during the match.
The standout players for HeadShotKings were Arias contributed 19 kills and Liam contributed 16 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 9117 overall damage.
On the defensive side, HeadShotKings held their ground firmly, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Amped analytics
The team Amped managed to secure 10 out of 23 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 2 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Amped were Bones contributed 18 kills and DacS contributed 17 kills. 8441 of total damage by Amped could not prevent HeadShotKings from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Amped struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments