Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:19s01:26s
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
124
Galil kills on a map
51.8171
Galil damage (avg/round)
18.45.8
Galil damage (avg/round)
16.15.8
Smoke thrown on a map
2214.6931
Player score (round)
35411011
Shots (total/round)
8416
Shots (total/round)
10816
Player score (round)
38581011
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Anubis
61%
Vertigo
57%
Inferno
28%
Ancient
20%
Mirage
14%
Nuke
5%
Dust II
0%
Last 5 maps
Anubis
0%
0
44
Vertigo
57%
21
4
Inferno
50%
18
3
Ancient
60%
10
29
Mirage
64%
14
11
Nuke
60%
15
11
Dust II
0%
0
0
Last 5 maps
Anubis
61%
18
6
Vertigo
0%
0
40
Inferno
78%
18
9
Ancient
80%
20
7
Mirage
50%
16
12
Nuke
55%
11
13
Dust II
0%
0
1
Info
Match analysis of AMKAL vs Liquid by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between AMKAL and Liquid, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Nuke, Inferno, and victory was secured by Liquid. The MVP of this match was cadiaN.
Liquid analytics
The team Liquid secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke, Inferno. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Liquid were cadiaN contributed 30 kills and skullz contributed 35 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 15028 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Liquid held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
AMKAL analytics
The team AMKAL managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for AMKAL were TRAVIS contributed 20 kills and Sdaim contributed 21 kills. 11507 of total damage by AMKAL could not prevent Liquid from securing the victory
On the defensive side, AMKAL struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments