AMKAL Scoreboard Nuke (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

14

14

1

0

79

0:1

3

2

6.2

+3%

13

18

4

-5

73

3:3

2

0

5.6

-20%

12

16

2

-4

67

3:5

2

0

5.2

-14%

9

16

2

-7

44

2:1

0

0

4.6

-28%

10

19

2

-9

55

1:2

1

0

4.5

-26%

Total

58

83

11

-25

317

9:12

8

2

5.2

-17%

Insilio Scoreboard Nuke (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

17

12

3

+5

95

4:2

5

0

7.3

+16%

16

9

7

+7

92

5:3

4

0

6.9

+27%

19

12

3

+7

95

1:1

5

0

6.8

+21%

16

13

5

+3

79

1:3

3

0

6.2

+10%

14

13

1

+1

64

1:0

4

0

5.8

-1%

Total

82

59

19

+23

426

12:9

21

0

6.6

+15%

Teams advantage Nuke (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of AMKAL vs Insilio by the Bo3.gg Team

Insilio on Nuke Analysis

Insilio demonstrated their prowers on Nuke, securing 13 out of 21 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Insilio on Nuke were sugaR, who contributed 17 kills, and FpSSS, who added 16 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Nuke, the team inflicted a total of 8949 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Nuke, Insilio held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


AMKAL on Nuke Analysis

Nuke proved to be a challenging battleground for AMKAL, as they managed to secure 8 out of 21 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for AMKAL on Nuke included TRAVIS, who contributed 14 kills, and nota, who added 13 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6662 total damage, AMKAL couldn't prevent Insilio from securing victory on Nuke


On the defensive side of Nuke, AMKAL struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date