0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:29s01:25s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:34s01:25s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:34s01:25s
Galil damage (avg/round)
18.95.9
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4482
AK47 damage (avg/round)
61.125.2
Assists on a map
12.14.4315
Damage (total/round)
39373
Player score (round)
49231010
Player score (round)
41571010
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Anubis
60%
Inferno
56%
Ancient
22%
Dust II
10%
Mirage
7%
Vertigo
5%
Nuke
2%
Last 5 maps
Anubis
0%
0
45
Inferno
56%
18
2
Ancient
42%
12
26
Dust II
30%
10
0
Mirage
43%
14
15
Vertigo
60%
25
6
Nuke
50%
20
6
Last 5 maps
Anubis
60%
42
2
Inferno
0%
0
42
Ancient
64%
28
14
Dust II
40%
5
9
Mirage
50%
18
12
Vertigo
55%
22
8
Nuke
52%
33
1
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of AMKAL vs Insilio by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between AMKAL and Insilio, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-2, on the following maps: Mirage, Nuke, Vertigo, and victory was secured by Insilio. The MVP of this match was FpSSS.
Insilio analytics
The team Insilio secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage, Nuke. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Insilio were FpSSS contributed 66 kills and sugaR contributed 49 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 29417 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Insilio held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
AMKAL analytics
The team AMKAL managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for AMKAL were TRAVIS contributed 51 kills and nota contributed 48 kills. 25929 of total damage by AMKAL could not prevent Insilio from securing the victory
On the defensive side, AMKAL struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments