0 Comments
Teams advantage Dust II (M1)
Lineups
Lineup
Lineup
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
54%
Vertigo
48%
Dust II
27%
Mirage
14%
Anubis
9%
Ancient
8%
Nuke
0%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
54%
46
1
Vertigo
48%
29
9
Dust II
60%
25
5
Mirage
36%
25
34
Anubis
52%
71
0
Ancient
37%
41
24
Nuke
0%
6
41
Last 5 maps
Inferno
0%
0
0
Vertigo
0%
1
0
Dust II
33%
3
0
Mirage
50%
8
0
Anubis
43%
7
0
Ancient
29%
7
0
Nuke
0%
2
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- llwlw
- wllll
Info
Map Analysis of ALTERNATE aTTaX vs HyperSpirit by the Bo3.gg Team
ALTERNATE aTTaX on Dust II Analysis
ALTERNATE aTTaX demonstrated their prowers on Dust II, securing 16 out of 29 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for ALTERNATE aTTaX on Dust II were hyped, who contributed 26 kills, and awzek, who added 21 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Dust II, the team inflicted a total of 11127 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Dust II, ALTERNATE aTTaX held their ground firmly, successfully defending 10 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
HyperSpirit on Dust II Analysis
Dust II proved to be a challenging battleground for HyperSpirit, as they managed to secure 13 out of 29 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for HyperSpirit on Dust II included kritik, who contributed 27 kills, and awks, who added 18 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 10706 total damage, HyperSpirit couldn't prevent ALTERNATE aTTaX from securing victory on Dust II
On the defensive side of Dust II, HyperSpirit struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments