0 Comments
Teams advantage Inferno (M1)
Lineups
Lineup
Lineup
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Ancient
25%
Mirage
21%
Vertigo
18%
Anubis
14%
Dust II
11%
Inferno
3%
Nuke
0%
Last 5 maps
Ancient
37%
43
25
Mirage
35%
26
35
Vertigo
50%
32
9
Anubis
54%
71
0
Dust II
58%
24
6
Inferno
56%
50
1
Nuke
0%
6
43
Last 5 maps
Ancient
62%
65
13
Mirage
56%
63
7
Vertigo
68%
44
8
Anubis
68%
59
10
Dust II
47%
30
25
Inferno
53%
36
16
Nuke
0%
0
76
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- llwwl
- lwwww
Info
Map Analysis of ALTERNATE aTTaX vs Passion UA by the Bo3.gg Team
Passion UA on Inferno Analysis
Passion UA demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 13 out of 23 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Passion UA on Inferno were Jambo, who contributed 18 kills, and jackasmo, who added 19 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 9089 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, Passion UA held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
ALTERNATE aTTaX on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for ALTERNATE aTTaX, as they managed to secure 10 out of 23 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for ALTERNATE aTTaX on Inferno included ArroW, who contributed 22 kills, and hyped, who added 17 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8134 total damage, ALTERNATE aTTaX couldn't prevent Passion UA from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, ALTERNATE aTTaX struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments