Ended
Full stats

0 Comments

Alliance Scoreboard Ancient (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

16

10

9

+6

75

2:1

4

2

7.0

+17%

17

15

7

+2

102

1:2

7

1

6.8

+22%

19

12

6

+7

91

2:2

5

0

6.8

+30%

11

13

5

-2

64

4:2

2

0

5.9

-6%

11

12

4

-1

53

3:2

2

0

5.4

-9%

Total

74

62

31

+12

385

12:9

20

3

6.4

+11%

HAVU Scoreboard Ancient (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

17

16

4

+1

90

4:5

5

0

6.6

+23%

17

12

2

+5

75

0:0

3

0

6.5

+21%

13

16

3

-3

77

4:0

1

0

6.2

-4%

8

15

4

-7

46

0:3

3

1

4.4

-23%

7

15

1

-8

38

1:4

1

0

4.0

-17%

Total

62

74

14

-12

326

9:12

13

1

5.5

0%

Teams advantage Ancient (M1)
Info
Map Analysis of Alliance vs HAVU by the Bo3.gg Team

Alliance on Ancient Analysis

Alliance demonstrated their prowers on Ancient, securing 13 out of 21 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Alliance on Ancient were twist, who contributed 16 kills, and PlesseN, who added 17 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Ancient, the team inflicted a total of 8089 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Ancient, Alliance held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


HAVU on Ancient Analysis

Ancient proved to be a challenging battleground for HAVU, as they managed to secure 8 out of 21 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for HAVU on Ancient included Airax, who contributed 17 kills, and ottoNd, who added 17 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6852 total damage, HAVU couldn't prevent Alliance from securing victory on Ancient


On the defensive side of Ancient, HAVU struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date