Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
M4A1 damage (avg/round)
48.916.7
USP damage (avg/round)
14.94.6
Galil kills on a map
41.8064
M4A4 kills on a map
113.6448
M4A4 damage (avg/round)
53.712.7
Damage (total/round)
40673
Player score (round)
38771012
Player score (round)
34881012
Damage (total/round)
39773
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Ancient
44%
Dust II
31%
Inferno
10%
Nuke
7%
Overpass
0%
Vertigo
0%
Mirage
0%
Last 5 maps
Ancient
74%
27
1
Dust II
64%
25
9
Inferno
50%
22
16
Nuke
58%
26
13
Overpass
0%
0
58
Vertigo
50%
20
15
Mirage
56%
27
7
Last 5 maps
Ancient
30%
10
10
Dust II
33%
9
16
Inferno
40%
15
15
Nuke
65%
26
1
Overpass
0%
4
21
Vertigo
50%
14
3
Mirage
56%
18
4
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of AGO vs Anonymo by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between AGO and Anonymo, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Ancient, Mirage, and victory was secured by AGO. The MVP of this match was F1KU.
AGO analytics
The team AGO secured 32 out of 47 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient, Mirage. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for AGO were F1KU contributed 42 kills and rallen contributed 41 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 20348 overall damage.
On the defensive side, AGO held their ground firmly, successfully defending 19 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Anonymo analytics
The team Anonymo managed to secure 15 out of 47 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 4 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Anonymo were innocent contributed 33 kills and blacktear5 contributed 21 kills. 14238 of total damage by Anonymo could not prevent AGO from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Anonymo struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments