0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
AWP kills on a map
196.3324
Speed Round (sec)
00:15s01:55s
Damage (total/round)
40073
Player score (round)
38981010
Damage (total/round)
40073
Player score (round)
37921010
Player score (round)
37191010
Player score (round)
37391010
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
50%
Mirage
38%
Ancient
24%
Dust II
23%
Inferno
14%
Nuke
9%
Anubis
6%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
50%
16
0
Mirage
0%
1
5
Ancient
12%
17
3
Dust II
56%
18
0
Inferno
39%
18
0
Nuke
13%
8
2
Anubis
44%
32
0
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
2
7
Mirage
38%
37
0
Ancient
36%
33
0
Dust II
33%
3
4
Inferno
53%
17
1
Nuke
22%
9
2
Anubis
38%
16
2
Info
Match analysis of ADEPTS vs Lilmix by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between ADEPTS and Lilmix, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Dust II, and victory was secured by ADEPTS. The MVP of this match was SBT.
ADEPTS analytics
The team ADEPTS secured 16 out of 29 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Dust II. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for ADEPTS were SBT contributed 27 kills and Chuckyy contributed 24 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 11398 overall damage.
On the defensive side, ADEPTS held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Lilmix analytics
The team Lilmix managed to secure 13 out of 29 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 4 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Lilmix were Jackinho contributed 21 kills and doobs contributed 19 kills. 10287 of total damage by Lilmix could not prevent ADEPTS from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Lilmix struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments