0 Comments
Teams advantage
Score
6.6
5.2
Anubis1.4
Win Rounds
13
5
Anubis8
Kills
71
48
Anubis23
Damage
7.5K
6.05K
Anubis1453
Economy
394.05K
323.5K
Anubis70550
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
a
60%
Inferno
33%
Ancient
a
31%
Anubis
a
22%
Vertigo
a
17%
Mirage
10%
Overpass
0%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
60%
5
5
Inferno
50%
4
7
Ancient
60%
5
7
Anubis
60%
10
1
Vertigo
67%
3
11
Mirage
40%
5
9
Overpass
0%
0
16
Last 5 maps
Nuke
0%
1
12
Inferno
83%
6
3
Ancient
29%
7
0
Anubis
38%
8
2
Vertigo
50%
2
6
Mirage
50%
6
3
Overpass
0%
0
8
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wwwll
- wwwwl
Info
Match analysis of adalYamigos vs Galorys by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between adalYamigos and Galorys, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Anubis, and victory was secured by adalYamigos. The MVP of this match was hoax.
adalYamigos analytics
The team adalYamigos secured 13 out of 18 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis. They also successfully set 4 bombs during the match.
The standout players for adalYamigos were shz contributed 16 kills and piriajr contributed 13 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7500 overall damage.
On the defensive side, adalYamigos held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Galorys analytics
The team Galorys managed to secure 5 out of 18 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Galorys were hoax contributed 15 kills and Koala contributed 14 kills. 6047 of total damage by Galorys could not prevent adalYamigos from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Galorys struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments