3DMAX Scoreboard Inferno (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

8

2

0

+6

143

2:0

2

0

10.0

+97%

4

3

2

+1

84

0:1

1

0

6.6

+15%

2

3

0

-1

42

1:1

0

0

4.7

-24%

1

2

0

-1

32

0:0

0

0

4.1

-33%

1

4

1

-3

29

0:0

0

0

3.8

-52%

Total

16

14

3

+2

330

3:2

3

0

5.8

+1%

Zero Tenacity Scoreboard Inferno (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

6

3

0

+3

102

1:0

2

0

7.9

+41%

3

3

1

0

71

1:1

1

0

5.7

-1%

2

4

1

-2

59

0:0

1

0

5.0

-26%

1

3

3

-2

47

0:0

0

0

4.1

-28%

1

3

0

-2

9

0:2

0

1

3.5

-49%

Total

13

16

5

-3

289

2:3

4

1

5.2

-13%

Teams advantage Inferno (M1)
Info
Map Analysis of 3DMAX vs Zero Tenacity by the Bo3.gg Team

Zero Tenacity on Inferno Analysis

Zero Tenacity demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 2 out of 5 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Zero Tenacity on Inferno were brutmonster, who contributed 6 kills, and Cjoffo, who added 3 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 1444 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, Zero Tenacity held their ground firmly, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


3DMAX on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for 3DMAX, as they managed to secure 3 out of 5 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for 3DMAX on Inferno included Graviti, who contributed 8 kills, and Ex3rcice, who added 4 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 1651 total damage, 3DMAX couldn't prevent Zero Tenacity from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, 3DMAX struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date