Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:27s01:27s
Molotov damage (avg/round)
8.12
Flash duration on a map (sec)
01:10s00:38s
Smoke thrown on a map
1814.8354
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4429
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
17.63.9
Shots (total/round)
9816
Shots (total/round)
8616
Multikill x-
4
Teammate kills
1
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Overpass
67%
Inferno
40%
Vertigo
40%
Mirage
40%
Nuke
17%
Anubis
14%
Ancient
6%
Last 5 maps
Overpass
33%
6
16
Inferno
73%
11
4
Vertigo
40%
5
8
Mirage
0%
1
26
Nuke
50%
8
2
Anubis
67%
12
1
Ancient
42%
12
9
Last 5 maps
Overpass
100%
1
6
Inferno
33%
3
2
Vertigo
0%
0
10
Mirage
40%
5
2
Nuke
67%
3
7
Anubis
53%
15
0
Ancient
36%
11
3
Info
Match analysis of 3DMAX vs GUN5 by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between 3DMAX and GUN5, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-1, on the following maps: Anubis, Ancient, Inferno, and victory was secured by 3DMAX. The MVP of this match was NBK-.
3DMAX analytics
The team 3DMAX secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis, Inferno. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for 3DMAX were NBK- contributed 51 kills and Lucky contributed 45 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 22778 overall damage.
On the defensive side, 3DMAX held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
GUN5 analytics
The team GUN5 managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for GUN5 were FinigaN contributed 43 kills and supra contributed 43 kills. 20364 of total damage by GUN5 could not prevent 3DMAX from securing the victory
On the defensive side, GUN5 struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments