0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:31s01:30s
Smoke thrown on a map
2715.0371
Shots (total/round)
9316
Damage (total/round)
42173
Player score (round)
36861012
Shots (total/round)
8516
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
83%
Anubis
60%
Dust II
50%
Ancient
15%
Overpass
11%
Vertigo
8%
Inferno
7%
Nuke
5%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
83%
18
0
Anubis
0%
0
10
Dust II
0%
0
0
Ancient
47%
17
2
Overpass
56%
16
3
Vertigo
67%
18
2
Inferno
67%
15
4
Nuke
53%
15
1
Last 5 maps
Mirage
0%
0
55
Anubis
60%
15
3
Dust II
50%
4
2
Ancient
62%
29
4
Overpass
45%
20
27
Vertigo
75%
24
2
Inferno
60%
20
23
Nuke
58%
26
4
Info
Match analysis of 1WIN vs SAW by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between 1WIN and SAW, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-1, on the following maps: Vertigo, Overpass, Nuke, and victory was secured by 1WIN. The MVP of this match was deko.
1WIN analytics
The team 1WIN secured 50 out of 96 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Vertigo, Nuke. They also successfully set 8 bombs during the match.
The standout players for 1WIN were deko contributed 94 kills and Forester contributed 72 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 36484 overall damage.
On the defensive side, 1WIN held their ground firmly, successfully defending 22 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
SAW analytics
The team SAW managed to secure 46 out of 96 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 13 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for SAW were story contributed 67 kills and rmn contributed 59 kills. 33083 of total damage by SAW could not prevent 1WIN from securing the victory
On the defensive side, SAW struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 19 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments