1WIN Scoreboard Anubis (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

21

14

7

+7

90

3:2

6

0

7.3

+15%

15

13

6

+2

62

1:1

5

0

6.2

-4%

12

12

3

0

56

3:3

2

0

5.7

-14%

12

16

11

-4

81

2:5

3

0

5.6

+3%

12

15

2

-3

59

1:2

3

1

5.3

-6%

Total

72

70

29

+2

348

10:13

19

1

6.0

-1%

ARROW Scoreboard Anubis (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

15

15

6

0

74

2:1

1

0

6.3

0%

15

14

4

+1

64

3:2

3

1

6.1

0%

14

14

2

0

63

3:0

4

0

5.9

0%

14

15

5

-1

70

1:2

1

0

5.9

-3%

12

16

7

-4

67

4:5

1

0

5.3

-4%

Total

70

74

24

-4

338

13:10

10

1

5.9

-3%

Teams advantage Anubis (M1)
Info
Map Analysis of 1WIN vs ARROW by the Bo3.gg Team

1WIN on Anubis Analysis

1WIN demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 23 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for 1WIN on Anubis were Hobbit, who contributed 21 kills, and Oz1k, who added 15 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 8013 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Anubis, 1WIN held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


ARROW on Anubis Analysis

Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for ARROW, as they managed to secure 10 out of 23 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for ARROW on Anubis included Twiksar, who contributed 15 kills, and Kre1N, who added 15 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7775 total damage, ARROW couldn't prevent 1WIN from securing victory on Anubis


On the defensive side of Anubis, ARROW struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date