0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Speed Round (sec)
00:34s01:55s
Damage (total/round)
40873
Player score (round)
37431010
Multikill x-
4
GLOCK kills on a map
41.4516
Speed Round (sec)
00:32s01:55s
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Teammate kills
1
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
67%
Dust II
56%
Ancient
12%
Anubis
5%
Mirage
3%
Vertigo
0%
Nuke
0%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
67%
9
2
Dust II
56%
16
2
Ancient
67%
15
4
Anubis
50%
12
4
Mirage
47%
19
1
Vertigo
0%
6
10
Nuke
50%
2
17
Last 5 maps
Inferno
0%
1
0
Dust II
0%
2
0
Ancient
55%
11
0
Anubis
45%
11
0
Mirage
50%
8
0
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Nuke
50%
4
0
Info
Match analysis of 1WIN vs ARROW by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between 1WIN and ARROW, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Dust II, Anubis, and victory was secured by 1WIN. The MVP of this match was Hobbit.
1WIN analytics
The team 1WIN secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Dust II, Anubis. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for 1WIN were Hobbit contributed 42 kills and cronuss contributed 29 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 16853 overall damage.
On the defensive side, 1WIN held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
ARROW analytics
The team ARROW managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for ARROW were P4TriCK contributed 30 kills and Kre1N contributed 29 kills. 15583 of total damage by ARROW could not prevent 1WIN from securing the victory
On the defensive side, ARROW struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments