0 Commentaires
201
187
44
+14
366
35:26
46
4
Inferno5.7
0%
Avantages des équipes
Enregistrements Match
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Éliminations avec USP en moyenne par carte
41.6074
Round rapide (sec)
00:27s01:55s
Score du joueur (round)
37151011
Multikills x-
4
Éliminations avec Galil en moyenne par carte
41.8171
Round rapide (sec)
00:19s01:55s
Éliminations avec USP en moyenne par carte
41.6074
Éliminations avec Desert Eagle en moyenne par carte
41.6672
Éliminations avec Galil en moyenne par carte
41.8171
Score du joueur (round)
40041011
Composition de l'équipe
Composition de l'équipe
- Titulaire
- Titulaire
- Titulaire
- Titulaire
- Titulaire
Composition de l'équipe
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Ancient
44%
Nuke
41%
Mirage
14%
Inferno
9%
Vertigo
8%
Anubis
1%
Dust II
0%
Dernières 5 cartes
Ancient
0%
0
72
Nuke
74%
34
6
Mirage
60%
35
19
Inferno
43%
23
17
Vertigo
33%
30
19
Anubis
61%
77
0
Dust II
0%
2
1
Dernières 5 cartes
Ancient
44%
16
7
Nuke
33%
3
25
Mirage
46%
13
8
Inferno
52%
21
4
Vertigo
25%
12
15
Anubis
60%
10
21
Dust II
0%
0
0
Derniers résultats
Matchs précédents
- gpggg
- gpggp
Informations
Match analysis of Zero Tenacity vs EYEBALLERS by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Zero Tenacity and EYEBALLERS, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-1, on the following maps: Mirage, Anubis, Inferno, and victory was secured by Zero Tenacity. The MVP of this match was nEMANHA.
Zero Tenacity analytics
The team Zero Tenacity secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage, Anubis. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Zero Tenacity were nEMANHA contributed 52 kills and aVN contributed 44 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 22351 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Zero Tenacity held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
EYEBALLERS analytics
The team EYEBALLERS managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for EYEBALLERS were HEAP contributed 43 kills and sapec contributed 39 kills. 20536 of total damage by EYEBALLERS could not prevent Zero Tenacity from securing the victory
On the defensive side, EYEBALLERS struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires