0 Commentaires
Avantages des équipes
Enregistrements Match
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Plantation de bombe rapide (sec)
00:21s01:24s
Éliminations avec Tec-9 en moyenne par carte
41.3011
Dégâts avec Tec-9 en moyenne (par tour)
12.53.6
Assistances en moyenne par carte
124.4746
Victoires éco contre achat complet
1
Score du joueur (round)
36271010
Tirs (total/round)
9116
Multikills x-
4
Multikills x-
4
Dégâts des grenades HE (total/round)
12026.1
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Dust II
67%
Nuke
25%
Mirage
22%
Inferno
15%
Anubis
13%
Vertigo
12%
Ancient
2%
Dernières 5 cartes
Dust II
67%
3
29
Nuke
63%
30
24
Mirage
39%
23
33
Inferno
60%
15
23
Anubis
65%
40
5
Vertigo
70%
37
1
Ancient
63%
27
10
Dernières 5 cartes
Dust II
0%
1
52
Nuke
38%
39
30
Mirage
61%
36
14
Inferno
45%
22
30
Anubis
52%
33
5
Vertigo
58%
33
3
Ancient
61%
28
15
Derniers résultats
Informations
Match analysis of MIBR vs Sharks by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between MIBR and Sharks, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Anubis, and victory was secured by Sharks. The MVP of this match was Gafolo.
Sharks analytics
The team Sharks secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Sharks were Gafolo contributed 20 kills and hoax contributed 19 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 8859 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Sharks held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
MIBR analytics
The team MIBR managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for MIBR were insani contributed 16 kills and Lucaozy contributed 18 kills. 9315 of total damage by MIBR could not prevent Sharks from securing the victory
On the defensive side, MIBR struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires