0 Kommentare
70
40
23
+30
433
14:4
20
0
+22%
40
70
12
-30
306
4:14
10
0
-23%
Teamvorteil Anubis (M1)
Datensätze Anubis
Rekord/Zeit/Karte
Wert/D
Setzen durch
Rivael
USP Schaden (avg/round)
14.74.7
M4A1 Schaden (avg/round)
47.416.3
GLOCK Schaden (avg/round)
134
Molotov Schaden (avg/round)
7.52
M4A1 Kills auf der Karte
94.491
M4A1 Schaden (avg/round)
48.216.3
USP Kills auf der Karte
41.6074
Rauch auf eine Karte geworfen
2014.6931
Schaden (total/round)
39973
Molotov Schaden (total/round)
12823.8
Info
Map Analysis of Zero Tenacity vs PARIVISION by the Bo3.gg Team
Zero Tenacity on Anubis Analysis
Zero Tenacity demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 18 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Zero Tenacity on Anubis were simke, who contributed 20 kills, and brutmonster, who added 17 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 7792 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Anubis, Zero Tenacity held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
PARIVISION on Anubis Analysis
Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for PARIVISION, as they managed to secure 5 out of 18 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for PARIVISION on Anubis included Qikert, who contributed 10 kills, and ArtFr0st, who added 8 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 5513 total damage, PARIVISION couldn't prevent Zero Tenacity from securing victory on Anubis
On the defensive side of Anubis, PARIVISION struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 1 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Kommentare