81
50
27
+31
459
12:6
25
1
Anubis7.1
+27%
LeistungenMatch
Rekord/Zeit/Karte
Wert/D
Setzen durch
Rivael
Schnelle Bombenanlage (sec)
00:31s01:27s
USP Kills auf der Karte
31.6107
HE Schaden (avg/round)
15.53.4
HE Schaden (avg/round)
12.33.4
M4A1 Kills auf der Karte
94.5517
M4A1 Schaden (avg/round)
4716.3
Galil Kills auf der Karte
41.8161
Galil Schaden (avg/round)
20.25.7
Rauch auf eine Karte geworfen
1614.8354
Tec-9 Kills auf der Karte
41.3025
Aufstellungen
Aufstellung
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
Aufstellung
Historisch Karten Gewinnrate Letzte 6 Monate
Ancient
64%
Inferno
50%
Anubis
43%
Overpass
37%
Nuke
8%
Vertigo
4%
Mirage
3%
Letzte 5 Karten
Ancient
0%
0
76
Inferno
50%
26
14
Anubis
68%
56
0
Overpass
37%
30
34
Nuke
59%
37
4
Vertigo
54%
28
22
Mirage
40%
40
16
Letzte 5 Karten
Ancient
64%
11
0
Inferno
0%
1
8
Anubis
25%
4
4
Overpass
0%
3
7
Nuke
67%
6
5
Vertigo
50%
4
0
Mirage
43%
7
1
Letzte Ergebnisse
Kopf an Kopf
Vergangene Spiele
- lllwl
- wlwll
Info
Match analysis of Zero Tenacity vs NAVI Junior by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Zero Tenacity and NAVI Junior, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Anubis, and victory was secured by Zero Tenacity. The MVP of this match was brutmonster.
Zero Tenacity analytics
The team Zero Tenacity secured 13 out of 18 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis. They also successfully set 1 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Zero Tenacity were brutmonster contributed 23 kills and Cjoffo contributed 21 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 8257 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Zero Tenacity held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
NAVI Junior analytics
The team NAVI Junior managed to secure 5 out of 18 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 2 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for NAVI Junior were Krabeni contributed 14 kills and fnl contributed 8 kills. 5773 of total damage by NAVI Junior could not prevent Zero Tenacity from securing the victory
On the defensive side, NAVI Junior struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Kommentare