81
50
27
+31
459
12:6
25
1
Anubis7.1
+27%
RekordyMecz
Rekord/Czas/Mapa
W/Ś
Ustaw według
Rywal
Szybkie podłożenie bomby (sec)
00:31s01:27s
Zabójstwa za pomocą USP na mapie
31.6107
Obrażenia od granatu (avg/round)
15.53.4
Obrażenia od granatu (avg/round)
12.33.4
Zabójstwa za pomocą M4A1 na mapie
94.5517
Obrażenia od M4A1 (avg/round)
4716.3
Zabójstwa za pomocą Galil kna mapie
41.8161
Obrażenia od Galil (avg/round)
20.25.7
Rzucenie dymówki na mapie
1614.8354
Zabójstwa za pomocą Tec-9 na mapie
41.3025
Składy
Skład
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
Skład
Historyczny Współczynnik wygranych map Ostatnie 6 miesięcy
Ancient
64%
Inferno
50%
Anubis
43%
Overpass
37%
Nuke
8%
Vertigo
4%
Mirage
3%
Ostatnie 5 map
Ancient
0%
0
76
Inferno
50%
26
14
Anubis
68%
56
0
Overpass
37%
30
34
Nuke
59%
37
4
Vertigo
54%
28
22
Mirage
40%
40
16
Ostatnie 5 map
Ancient
64%
11
0
Inferno
0%
1
8
Anubis
25%
4
4
Overpass
0%
3
7
Nuke
67%
6
5
Vertigo
50%
4
0
Mirage
43%
7
1
Ostatnie wyniki
Łeb w łeb
Poprzednie mecze
- lllwl
- wlwll
Informacja
Match analysis of Zero Tenacity vs NAVI Junior by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Zero Tenacity and NAVI Junior, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Anubis, and victory was secured by Zero Tenacity. The MVP of this match was brutmonster.
Zero Tenacity analytics
The team Zero Tenacity secured 13 out of 18 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis. They also successfully set 1 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Zero Tenacity were brutmonster contributed 23 kills and Cjoffo contributed 21 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 8257 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Zero Tenacity held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
NAVI Junior analytics
The team NAVI Junior managed to secure 5 out of 18 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 2 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for NAVI Junior were Krabeni contributed 14 kills and fnl contributed 8 kills. 5773 of total damage by NAVI Junior could not prevent Zero Tenacity from securing the victory
On the defensive side, NAVI Junior struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Komentarze