0 Kommentare
Teamvorteil Inferno (M1)
Historisch Karten Gewinnrate Letzte 6 Monate
Ancient
54%
Mirage
47%
Inferno
40%
Overpass
31%
Dust II
21%
Vertigo
17%
Nuke
5%
Letzte 5 Karten
Ancient
0%
3
11
Mirage
47%
30
1
Inferno
24%
21
1
Overpass
33%
3
11
Dust II
69%
13
3
Vertigo
67%
3
8
Nuke
50%
16
2
Letzte 5 Karten
Ancient
54%
26
12
Mirage
0%
3
35
Inferno
64%
45
7
Overpass
64%
33
9
Dust II
48%
25
14
Vertigo
84%
31
3
Nuke
45%
22
17
Letzte Ergebnisse
Kopf an Kopf
Vergangene Spiele
- wlwlw
- wwwll
Info
Map Analysis of Zero Tenacity vs MASONIC by the Bo3.gg Team
MASONIC on Inferno Analysis
MASONIC demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 0 out of 24 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for MASONIC on Inferno were Anlelele, who contributed 21 kills, and notaN, who added 23 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 10116 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, MASONIC held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Zero Tenacity on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Zero Tenacity, as they managed to secure 24 out of 24 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Zero Tenacity on Inferno included simke, who contributed 26 kills, and fajkus, who added 11 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7583 total damage, Zero Tenacity couldn't prevent MASONIC from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, Zero Tenacity struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Kommentare