0 Kommentare
245
211
92
+34
399
38:29
58
4
Mirage6.5
+7%
LeistungenMatch
Rekord/Zeit/Karte
Wert/D
Setzen durch
Rivael
Schnelle Bombenanlage (sec)
00:25s01:25s
Rauch auf eine Karte geworfen
2114.5022
M4A1 Schaden (avg/round)
44.416.3
USP Kills auf der Karte
41.6027
USP Schaden (avg/round)
15.74.8
GLOCK Kills auf der Karte
31.4482
GLOCK Schaden (avg/round)
11.74.1
Prozentsatz der Kopfschüsse
38%15%
Rauch auf eine Karte geworfen
2014.5022
Schaden (total/round)
40073
Aufstellungen
Aufstellung
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Aufstellung
Historisch Karten Gewinnrate Letzte 6 Monate
Nuke
50%
Ancient
40%
Anubis
30%
Inferno
14%
Mirage
8%
Dust II
5%
Vertigo
4%
Letzte 5 Karten
Nuke
68%
37
9
Ancient
0%
0
89
Anubis
69%
116
0
Inferno
54%
41
11
Mirage
51%
51
19
Dust II
50%
24
13
Vertigo
40%
35
31
Letzte 5 Karten
Nuke
18%
11
51
Ancient
40%
40
5
Anubis
39%
41
13
Inferno
40%
42
3
Mirage
43%
44
10
Dust II
55%
11
13
Vertigo
36%
11
56
Letzte Ergebnisse
Vergangene Spiele
- lwlww
- wllwl
Info
Match analysis of Zero Tenacity vs EYEBALLERS by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Zero Tenacity and EYEBALLERS, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-1, on the following maps: Nuke, Anubis, Mirage, and victory was secured by Zero Tenacity. The MVP of this match was brutmonster.
Zero Tenacity analytics
The team Zero Tenacity secured 37 out of 67 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke, Mirage. They also successfully set 8 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Zero Tenacity were brutmonster contributed 61 kills and Cjoffo contributed 50 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 26708 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Zero Tenacity held their ground firmly, successfully defending 17 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
EYEBALLERS analytics
The team EYEBALLERS managed to secure 30 out of 67 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 5 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for EYEBALLERS were poiii contributed 63 kills and delle contributed 43 kills. 23506 of total damage by EYEBALLERS could not prevent Zero Tenacity from securing the victory
On the defensive side, EYEBALLERS struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Kommentare