0 Comentários
352
327
62
+25
382
51:49
90
2
Mirage6.2
+6%
Registros Partida
Registro/Tempo/Mapa
Val/M
Feito por
Rival
Escalação
escalação
Início
Início
Início
Início
Início
Histórico % de êxito dos mapas Últimos 6 meses
Dust II
83%
Vertigo
58%
Anubis
40%
Ancient
38%
Inferno
32%
Overpass
30%
Mirage
19%
Nuke
0%
Últimos 5 mapas
Dust II
83%
6
2
Vertigo
58%
12
5
Anubis
40%
5
2
Ancient
0%
3
22
Inferno
18%
22
8
Overpass
63%
8
10
Mirage
52%
27
1
Nuke
43%
21
1
Últimos 5 mapas
Dust II
0%
1
2
Vertigo
0%
2
7
Anubis
0%
2
2
Ancient
38%
8
1
Inferno
50%
6
1
Overpass
33%
9
1
Mirage
33%
6
2
Nuke
43%
7
3
Últimos resultados
Frente a frente
Partidas anteriores
- llVll
- VllVl
Info
Match analysis of Zero Tenacity vs Sampi by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Zero Tenacity and Sampi, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-1, on the following maps: Mirage, Overpass, Nuke, and victory was secured by Zero Tenacity. The MVP of this match was sAvana1.
Zero Tenacity analytics
The team Zero Tenacity secured 0 out of 101 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage, Overpass. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Zero Tenacity were simke contributed 83 kills and brutmonster contributed 73 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 38219 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Zero Tenacity held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Sampi analytics
The team Sampi managed to secure 101 out of 101 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 12 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Sampi were sAvana1 contributed 77 kills and MATYS contributed 74 kills. 35919 of total damage by Sampi could not prevent Zero Tenacity from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Sampi struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 49 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comentários