0 Comentários
72
35
24
+37
461
11:5
20
2
+30%
Vantagens da equipe Dust II (M2)
Registros Dust II
Registro/Tempo/Mapa
Val/M
Feito por
Rival
Planta de bombas rápidas (seg )
00:32s01:26s
Planta de bombas rápidas (seg )
00:25s01:26s
Danos por GLOCK (média/rodada)
11.94
Porcentagem de tiros na cabeça
38%15%
Dano por USP (média/rodada)
13.64.7
Danos por HE (média/rodada)
21.33.4
M4A1 kills no mapa
94.491
Danos por M4A1 (média/rodada)
47.516.3
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4456
Danos por GLOCK (média/rodada)
12.84
Info
Map Analysis of Zero Tenacity vs GhoulsW by the Bo3.gg Team
Zero Tenacity on Dust II Analysis
Zero Tenacity demonstrated their prowers on Dust II, securing 13 out of 16 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Zero Tenacity on Dust II were brutmonster, who contributed 18 kills, and Cjoffo, who added 16 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Dust II, the team inflicted a total of 7374 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Dust II, Zero Tenacity held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
GhoulsW on Dust II Analysis
Dust II proved to be a challenging battleground for GhoulsW, as they managed to secure 3 out of 16 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for GhoulsW on Dust II included fostar, who contributed 10 kills, and lunAtic, who added 7 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 4180 total damage, GhoulsW couldn't prevent Zero Tenacity from securing victory on Dust II
On the defensive side of Dust II, GhoulsW struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comentários