0 Comentários
68
41
15
+27
423
10:7
15
1
+21%
Vantagens da equipe Anubis (M1)
Registros Anubis
Registro/Tempo/Mapa
Val/M
Feito por
Rival
Planta de bombas rápidas (seg )
00:28s01:25s
Planta de bombas rápidas (seg )
00:32s01:25s
Deagle kills no mapa
31.6558
Danos por Galil (média/rodada)
17.55.9
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4482
Danos por GLOCK (média/rodada)
14.14.1
Dano de molotov (média/rodada)
9.52.1
Danos por GLOCK (média/rodada)
11.84.1
Fumaça lançada no mapa
1814.5022
Porcentagem de tiros na cabeça
38%15%
Info
Map Analysis of Zero Tenacity vs EYEBALLERS by the Bo3.gg Team
Zero Tenacity on Anubis Analysis
Zero Tenacity demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 17 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Zero Tenacity on Anubis were aVN, who contributed 16 kills, and nEMANHA, who added 17 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 7195 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Anubis, Zero Tenacity held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
EYEBALLERS on Anubis Analysis
Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for EYEBALLERS, as they managed to secure 4 out of 17 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for EYEBALLERS on Anubis included Peppzor, who contributed 13 kills, and Golden, who added 8 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 5062 total damage, EYEBALLERS couldn't prevent Zero Tenacity from securing victory on Anubis
On the defensive side of Anubis, EYEBALLERS struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comentários