0 Comentários
79
85
32
-6
381
12:12
18
1
-2%
Vantagens da equipe Anubis (M2)
Registros Anubis
Registro/Tempo/Mapa
Val/M
Feito por
Rival
Planta de bombas rápidas (seg )
00:32s01:25s
Planta de bombas rápidas (seg )
00:27s01:25s
Planta de bombas rápidas (seg )
00:30s01:25s
Fumaça lançada no mapa
2214.5022
Tiros na cabeça (total/mapa)
238
GLOCK kills on a map
41.4482
Danos por GLOCK (média/rodada)
14.34.1
Kills em um mapa
39.1216.9373
Danos (média/rodada)
147.31871.7
Tiros na cabeça no mapa
23.040.3159
Info
Map Analysis of Zero Tenacity vs EYEBALLERS by the Bo3.gg Team
EYEBALLERS on Anubis Analysis
EYEBALLERS demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 24 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for EYEBALLERS on Anubis were poiii, who contributed 39 kills, and HEAP, who added 14 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 9090 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Anubis, EYEBALLERS held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Zero Tenacity on Anubis Analysis
Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for Zero Tenacity, as they managed to secure 11 out of 24 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Zero Tenacity on Anubis included brutmonster, who contributed 22 kills, and Cjoffo, who added 17 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 9142 total damage, Zero Tenacity couldn't prevent EYEBALLERS from securing victory on Anubis
On the defensive side of Anubis, Zero Tenacity struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comentários