0 Comentários
127
136
41
-9
352
16:24
31
3
Nuke5.5
-3%
Registros Partida
Registro/Tempo/Mapa
Val/M
Feito por
Rival
Escalação
escalação
Início
Início
Início
Início
Início
escalação
Início
Início
Início
Início
Início
Histórico % de êxito dos mapas Últimos 6 meses
Ancient
70%
Anubis
23%
Overpass
21%
Nuke
19%
Mirage
17%
Inferno
4%
Vertigo
0%
Últimos 5 mapas
Ancient
0%
0
71
Anubis
69%
55
0
Overpass
39%
28
32
Nuke
54%
39
5
Mirage
44%
41
9
Inferno
52%
33
11
Vertigo
50%
28
21
Últimos 5 mapas
Ancient
70%
20
14
Anubis
46%
13
32
Overpass
60%
15
11
Nuke
73%
30
2
Mirage
61%
28
10
Inferno
56%
9
27
Vertigo
50%
18
11
Últimos resultados
Partidas anteriores
- lVVVl
- llllV
Info
Match analysis of Zero Tenacity vs Espionage by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Zero Tenacity and Espionage, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Anubis, Nuke, and victory was secured by Espionage. The MVP of this match was Cabbi.
Espionage analytics
The team Espionage secured 24 out of 42 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis, Nuke. They also successfully set 6 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Espionage were Cabbi contributed 43 kills and IceBerg contributed 24 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 14367 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Espionage held their ground firmly, successfully defending 12 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Zero Tenacity analytics
The team Zero Tenacity managed to secure 18 out of 42 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 4 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Zero Tenacity were Cjoffo contributed 31 kills and aVN contributed 26 kills. 14212 of total damage by Zero Tenacity could not prevent Espionage from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Zero Tenacity struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comentários