0 Comentários
50
68
13
-18
314
9:8
9
0
-15%
Vantagens da equipe Anubis (M1)
Registros Anubis
Registro/Tempo/Mapa
Val/M
Feito por
Rival
Planta de bombas rápidas (seg )
00:18s01:25s
Planta de bombas rápidas (seg )
00:32s01:25s
AWP kills no mapa
136.4049
Danos por AWP (média/rodada)
66.521.6
USP mortas no mapa
31.6027
Dano por USP (média/rodada)
26.44.8
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4482
Danos por GLOCK (média/rodada)
12.84.1
Danos por GLOCK (média/rodada)
11.64.1
Fumaça lançada no mapa
2114.5022
Info
Map Analysis of Zero Tenacity vs CPH Wolves by the Bo3.gg Team
CPH Wolves on Anubis Analysis
CPH Wolves demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 17 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for CPH Wolves on Anubis were eraa, who contributed 19 kills, and Tapewaare, who added 17 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 6922 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Anubis, CPH Wolves held their ground firmly, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Zero Tenacity on Anubis Analysis
Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for Zero Tenacity, as they managed to secure 4 out of 17 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Zero Tenacity on Anubis included Cjoffo, who contributed 12 kills, and brutmonster, who added 13 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 5346 total damage, Zero Tenacity couldn't prevent CPH Wolves from securing victory on Anubis
On the defensive side of Anubis, Zero Tenacity struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 1 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comentários