Zero Tenacity Placar Anubis (M2)

+/-

PONTOS DAS RODADAS

18

9

0

+9

74

5:1

5

1

7.5

+24%

15

14

10

+1

96

3:3

3

1

6.9

+3%

13

9

1

+4

67

4:1

3

0

6.5

+14%

12

11

2

+1

73

0:1

2

1

5.9

+2%

11

10

4

+1

57

1:1

1

0

5.5

-7%

Total

69

53

17

+16

367

13:7

14

3

6.5

+7%

3DMAX Placar Anubis (M2)

+/-

PONTOS DAS RODADAS

16

15

4

+1

85

3:4

4

0

6.4

+7%

12

13

5

-1

66

1:0

2

0

5.8

-14%

10

14

4

-4

64

2:2

4

0

5.5

-11%

9

14

3

-5

63

1:3

2

0

5.0

-17%

6

13

3

-7

41

0:4

0

0

4.0

-34%

Total

53

69

19

-16

318

7:13

12

0

5.3

-14%

Vantagens da equipe Anubis (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of Zero Tenacity vs 3DMAX by the Bo3.gg Team

Zero Tenacity on Anubis Analysis

Zero Tenacity demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 20 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Zero Tenacity on Anubis were Cjoffo, who contributed 18 kills, and nEMANHA, who added 15 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 7337 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Anubis, Zero Tenacity held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


3DMAX on Anubis Analysis

Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for 3DMAX, as they managed to secure 7 out of 20 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for 3DMAX on Anubis included Djoko, who contributed 16 kills, and Maka, who added 12 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6365 total damage, 3DMAX couldn't prevent Zero Tenacity from securing victory on Anubis


On the defensive side of Anubis, 3DMAX struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 1 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comentários
Por data