0 Comentários
Vantagem das equipes
Pontuação
6.5
5.3
Inferno1.1
Rodadas vencedoras
0
0
Inferno0
Kills
0
0
Inferno0
Danos
0
0
Inferno0
Economia
442.75K
432.4K
Inferno10350
Registros Partida
Registro/Tempo/Mapa
Val/M
Feito por
Rival
Histórico % de êxito dos mapas Últimos 6 meses
Overpass
W
75%
Mirage
W
71%
Inferno
W
67%
Nuke
47%
Anubis
33%
Vertigo
W
20%
Ancient
W
20%
Últimos 5 mapas
Overpass
75%
4
0
Mirage
71%
7
0
Inferno
100%
4
0
Nuke
20%
5
1
Anubis
0%
0
4
Vertigo
20%
5
0
Ancient
20%
5
2
Últimos 5 mapas
Overpass
0%
0
0
Mirage
0%
0
0
Inferno
33%
3
0
Nuke
67%
3
0
Anubis
33%
3
0
Vertigo
0%
2
0
Ancient
0%
0
0
Info
Match analysis of Wu-Tang vs SHIPACHI by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Wu-Tang and SHIPACHI, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Inferno, and victory was secured by Wu-Tang. The MVP of this match was Maze.
Wu-Tang analytics
The team Wu-Tang secured 13 out of 21 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno. They also successfully set 4 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Wu-Tang were Maze contributed 17 kills and Kind0 contributed 13 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7272 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Wu-Tang held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
SHIPACHI analytics
The team SHIPACHI managed to secure 8 out of 21 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 3 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for SHIPACHI were Remill contributed 18 kills and z1k4 contributed 12 kills. 6251 of total damage by SHIPACHI could not prevent Wu-Tang from securing the victory
On the defensive side, SHIPACHI struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comentários