0 Comentários
53
78
17
-25
322
7:14
12
0
Anubis5.2
-13%
Registros Partida
Registro/Tempo/Mapa
Val/M
Feito por
Rival
Escalação
escalação
- Iniciante
- Iniciante
- Iniciante
- —
- Iniciante
Histórico % de êxito dos mapas Últimos 6 meses
Inferno
100%
Anubis
60%
Nuke
33%
Mirage
17%
Dust II
0%
Ancient
0%
Últimos 5 mapas
Inferno
100%
1
0
Anubis
100%
1
0
Nuke
0%
1
1
Mirage
50%
2
2
Dust II
0%
0
1
Ancient
0%
1
0
Últimos 5 mapas
Inferno
0%
0
4
Anubis
40%
5
1
Nuke
33%
3
0
Mirage
67%
3
0
Dust II
0%
1
1
Ancient
0%
1
3
Últimos resultados
Frente a frente
Partidas anteriores
- lVl
- VlVll
Info
Match analysis of vagrants vs Chicken Coop by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between vagrants and Chicken Coop, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Anubis, and victory was secured by vagrants. The MVP of this match was Cyrix.
vagrants analytics
The team vagrants secured 13 out of 21 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis. They also successfully set 3 bombs during the match.
The standout players for vagrants were Cyrix contributed 19 kills and Sandman contributed 18 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 8604 overall damage.
On the defensive side, vagrants held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Chicken Coop analytics
The team Chicken Coop managed to secure 8 out of 21 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 2 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Chicken Coop were taggy contributed 12 kills and FRIZZY contributed 12 kills. 6756 of total damage by Chicken Coop could not prevent vagrants from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Chicken Coop struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comentários