0 Comentários
54
55
17
-1
298
4:6
12
1
Mirage5.9
+9%
Registros Partida
Registro/Tempo/Mapa
Val/M
Feito por
Rival
Rodada rápida (sec)
00:33s01:55s
Pontuação do jogador (rodada)
35601011
Múltiplos kills x-
4
Múltiplos kills x-
4
Múltiplos kills x-
4
Clutch (adversários)
2
Histórico % de êxito dos mapas Últimos 6 meses
Vertigo
67%
Mirage
58%
Ancient
54%
Inferno
53%
Nuke
50%
Anubis
44%
Overpass
40%
Últimos 5 mapas
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Mirage
0%
1
0
Ancient
0%
0
0
Inferno
0%
0
0
Nuke
0%
0
0
Anubis
0%
1
0
Overpass
0%
0
0
Últimos 5 mapas
Vertigo
67%
15
3
Mirage
58%
19
8
Ancient
54%
13
9
Inferno
53%
15
6
Nuke
50%
10
9
Anubis
44%
16
6
Overpass
40%
5
25
Info
Match analysis of PeeP vs ARCRED by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between PeeP and ARCRED, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Mirage, and victory was secured by ARCRED. The MVP of this match was SynyX.
ARCRED analytics
The team ARCRED secured 13 out of 21 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for ARCRED were SynyX contributed 16 kills and DSSj contributed 18 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 8156 overall damage.
On the defensive side, ARCRED held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
PeeP analytics
The team PeeP managed to secure 8 out of 21 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for PeeP were YumsaN contributed 17 kills and la3euka contributed 15 kills. 6197 of total damage by PeeP could not prevent ARCRED from securing the victory
On the defensive side, PeeP struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comentários