0 Comentários
51
68
18
-17
354
8:8
12
1
-5%
Vantagens da equipe Ancient (M3)
Registros Ancient
Registro/Tempo/Mapa
Val/M
Feito por
Rival
Planta de bombas rápidas (seg )
00:32s01:25s
Planta de bombas rápidas (seg )
00:29s01:25s
USP mortas no mapa
31.6027
Dano por USP (média/rodada)
14.84.8
Dano de molotov (média/rodada)
7.12.1
Galil kills no mapa
31.8164
Danos por Galil (média/rodada)
18.65.9
Dano de molotov (média/rodada)
7.22.1
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4482
Danos por GLOCK (média/rodada)
24.24.1
Info
Map Analysis of Solid vs Bad News Chickens by the Bo3.gg Team
Solid on Ancient Analysis
Solid demonstrated their prowers on Ancient, securing 13 out of 16 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Solid on Ancient were ALLE, who contributed 18 kills, and gbb, who added 16 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Ancient, the team inflicted a total of 6990 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Ancient, Solid held their ground firmly, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Bad News Chickens on Ancient Analysis
Ancient proved to be a challenging battleground for Bad News Chickens, as they managed to secure 3 out of 16 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Bad News Chickens on Ancient included short, who contributed 12 kills, and desh, who added 13 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 5667 total damage, Bad News Chickens couldn't prevent Solid from securing victory on Ancient
On the defensive side of Ancient, Bad News Chickens struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comentários