0 Comentários
76
95
25
-19
330
12:16
14
0
-11%
Vantagens da equipe Vertigo (M2)
Registros Vertigo
Registro/Tempo/Mapa
Val/M
Feito por
Rival
Planta de bombas rápidas (seg )
00:31s01:30s
Danos por HE (média/rodada)
12.83.4
Duração do flash no mapa (sec)
01:58s00:39s
Danos por GLOCK (média/rodada)
11.23.8
Danos por Deagle (média/rodada)
17.15.4
Fumaça lançada no mapa
2915.0371
Pontuação do jogador (rodada)
38071012
Múltiplos kills x-
4
Múltiplos kills x-
4
Clutch (adversários)
2
Info
Map Analysis of SINNERS vs Copenhagen Flames by the Bo3.gg Team
SINNERS on Vertigo Analysis
SINNERS demonstrated their prowers on Vertigo, securing 16 out of 28 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for SINNERS on Vertigo were ZEDKO, who contributed 21 kills, and KWERTZZ, who added 25 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Vertigo, the team inflicted a total of 10508 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Vertigo, SINNERS held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Copenhagen Flames on Vertigo Analysis
Vertigo proved to be a challenging battleground for Copenhagen Flames, as they managed to secure 12 out of 28 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Copenhagen Flames on Vertigo included TMB, who contributed 20 kills, and Farlig, who added 16 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 9229 total damage, Copenhagen Flames couldn't prevent SINNERS from securing victory on Vertigo
On the defensive side of Vertigo, Copenhagen Flames struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comentários