0 Comentários
100
85
35
+15
379
18:11
25
5
+5%
Vantagens da equipe Vertigo (M1)
Registros Vertigo
Registro/Tempo/Mapa
Val/M
Feito por
Rival
Danos por HE (média/rodada)
123.4
Danos por Galil (média/rodada)
19.45.6
Duração do flash no mapa (sec)
02:000s00:39s
Danos por HE (média/rodada)
18.33.4
Dano de molotov (média/rodada)
10.52
Fumaça lançada no mapa
2815.0371
Galil kills no mapa
71.8064
Danos por Galil (média/rodada)
22.25.6
Danos por HE (média/rodada)
13.83.4
Tiros (total/rodada)
12516
Info
Map Analysis of SINNERS vs Copenhagen Flames by the Bo3.gg Team
Copenhagen Flames on Vertigo Analysis
Copenhagen Flames demonstrated their prowers on Vertigo, securing 16 out of 29 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Copenhagen Flames on Vertigo were TMB, who contributed 26 kills, and regali, who added 24 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Vertigo, the team inflicted a total of 10991 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Vertigo, Copenhagen Flames held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
SINNERS on Vertigo Analysis
Vertigo proved to be a challenging battleground for SINNERS, as they managed to secure 13 out of 29 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for SINNERS on Vertigo included beastik, who contributed 26 kills, and ZEDKO, who added 18 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 9303 total damage, SINNERS couldn't prevent Copenhagen Flames from securing victory on Vertigo
On the defensive side of Vertigo, SINNERS struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comentários