SAW Placar Anubis (M2)

+/-

PONTOS DAS RODADAS

22

16

3

+6

97

4:3

4

0

7.2

+19%

24

13

3

+11

89

4:1

6

1

7.2

+23%

20

14

7

+6

90

3:4

6

0

6.6

+19%

18

12

5

+6

79

3:2

5

1

6.4

+16%

12

13

5

-1

47

1:1

3

0

5.1

-11%

Total

96

68

23

+28

401

15:11

24

2

6.5

+13%

Zero Tenacity Placar Anubis (M2)

+/-

PONTOS DAS RODADAS

16

18

3

-2

79

2:3

4

0

5.9

-1%

16

20

2

-4

68

3:2

4

1

5.8

-7%

14

22

3

-8

71

2:4

4

0

5.3

-16%

13

18

0

-5

50

3:3

3

0

5.1

-21%

8

19

4

-11

49

1:3

3

0

4.5

-30%

Total

67

97

12

-30

316

11:15

18

1

5.3

-15%

Vantagens da equipe Anubis (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of SAW vs Zero Tenacity by the Bo3.gg Team

SAW on Anubis Analysis

SAW demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 16 out of 26 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for SAW on Anubis were ewjerkz, who contributed 22 kills, and story, who added 24 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 10419 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Anubis, SAW held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Zero Tenacity on Anubis Analysis

Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for Zero Tenacity, as they managed to secure 10 out of 26 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Zero Tenacity on Anubis included nEMANHA, who contributed 16 kills, and Cjoffo, who added 16 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8217 total damage, Zero Tenacity couldn't prevent SAW from securing victory on Anubis


On the defensive side of Anubis, Zero Tenacity struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comentários
Por data