0 Comentários
Vantagem das equipes
Pontuação
7
5.2
Nuke1.9
Rodadas vencedoras
32
10
Nuke12
Kills
178
107
Nuke41
Danos
18.48K
12.69K
Nuke3502
Economia
957.85K
742.2K
Nuke150600
Registros Partida
Registro/Tempo/Mapa
Val/M
Feito por
Rival
AK47 kills no mapa
146.732
AK47 damage (média/rodada)
63.125.3
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4398
Danos por GLOCK (média/rodada)
13.63.8
Danos por Deagle (média/rodada)
16.55.4
Tiros (total/rodada)
9016
Tiros (total/rodada)
11716
Pontuação do jogador (rodada)
39931012
Múltiplos kills x-
4
Clutch (adversários)
2
Histórico % de êxito dos mapas Últimos 6 meses
Últimos resultados
Frente a frente
Info
Match analysis of Rooster vs Morbin5 by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Rooster and Morbin5, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Dust II, Nuke, and victory was secured by Rooster. The MVP of this match was dangeR.
Rooster analytics
The team Rooster secured 32 out of 42 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Dust II, Nuke. They also successfully set 3 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Rooster were dangeR contributed 45 kills and asap contributed 35 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 18476 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Rooster held their ground firmly, successfully defending 14 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Morbin5 analytics
The team Morbin5 managed to secure 10 out of 42 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 3 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Morbin5 were ObZen contributed 28 kills and Prodigy contributed 23 kills. 12685 of total damage by Morbin5 could not prevent Rooster from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Morbin5 struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comentários