0 Comentários
38
67
16
-29
305
4:11
7
1
-25%
Vantagens da equipe Inferno (M0)
Registros Inferno
Registro/Tempo/Mapa
Val/M
Feito por
Rival
A sequência de vitórias das rodadas
103
M4A4 kills no mapa
63.4961
Dano de molotov (média/rodada)
6.12
Duração do flash no mapa (sec)
01:07s00:37s
Duração do flash no mapa (sec)
00:53s00:37s
Flash cego no mapa (opp)
7529
Dano de molotov (média/rodada)
7.72
Galil kills no mapa
61.8171
Danos por Galil (média/rodada)
32.15.8
USP mortas no mapa
31.6074
Info
Map Analysis of Rooster vs Bad News Kangaroos by the Bo3.gg Team
Rooster on Inferno Analysis
Rooster demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 13 out of 15 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Rooster on Inferno were dangeR, who contributed 19 kills, and nettik, who added 14 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 7002 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, Rooster held their ground firmly, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Bad News Kangaroos on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Bad News Kangaroos, as they managed to secure 2 out of 15 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Bad News Kangaroos on Inferno included HaZR, who contributed 11 kills, and ADDICT, who added 8 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 4582 total damage, Bad News Kangaroos couldn't prevent Rooster from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, Bad News Kangaroos struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comentários