0 Comentários
Vantagem das equipes
Pontuação
6.3
5.9
Ancient0.4
Rodadas vencedoras
16
13
Ancient3
Kills
109
99
Ancient10
Danos
11.87K
10.88K
Ancient998
Economia
681.15K
611.8K
Ancient69350
Registros Partida
Registro/Tempo/Mapa
Val/M
Feito por
Rival
Histórico % de êxito dos mapas Últimos 6 meses
Overpass
75%
Vertigo
71%
Dust II
45%
Inferno
43%
Mirage
42%
Ancient
7%
Nuke
0%
Últimos 5 mapas
Overpass
0%
0
0
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Dust II
0%
0
0
Inferno
0%
0
0
Mirage
40%
5
0
Ancient
33%
3
0
Nuke
50%
6
0
Últimos 5 mapas
Overpass
75%
8
4
Vertigo
71%
7
9
Dust II
45%
11
7
Inferno
43%
14
2
Mirage
82%
17
1
Ancient
40%
5
14
Nuke
50%
6
13
Info
Match analysis of RAIKIRI vs AVANGAR by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between RAIKIRI and AVANGAR, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Ancient, and victory was secured by RAIKIRI. The MVP of this match was munch.
RAIKIRI analytics
The team RAIKIRI secured 0 out of 29 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for RAIKIRI were munch contributed 26 kills and t0kk contributed 24 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 11873 overall damage.
On the defensive side, RAIKIRI held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
AVANGAR analytics
The team AVANGAR managed to secure 29 out of 29 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 2 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for AVANGAR were kade0 contributed 22 kills and sorrow contributed 21 kills. 10875 of total damage by AVANGAR could not prevent RAIKIRI from securing the victory
On the defensive side, AVANGAR struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 15 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comentários