Preasy Placar Anubis (M0)

+/-

PONTOS DAS RODADAS

19

12

1

+7

78

0:2

5

1

6.7

+18%

12

15

3

-3

67

3:4

2

0

5.6

-5%

10

17

2

-7

48

3:2

2

1

5.3

-24%

8

16

6

-8

49

1:1

1

0

4.7

-21%

8

18

8

-10

62

1:5

1

0

4.6

-17%

Total

57

78

20

-21

304

8:14

11

2

5.4

-10%

CPH Wolves Placar Anubis (M0)

+/-

PONTOS DAS RODADAS

20

15

3

+5

106

7:3

5

0

7.8

+15%

21

11

4

+10

90

3:1

4

0

7.7

+69%

19

7

2

+12

82

1:1

5

0

7.1

+46%

11

13

4

-2

64

2:1

2

0

5.7

-13%

5

12

5

-7

40

1:2

0

0

4.5

-26%

Total

76

58

18

+18

382

14:8

16

0

6.6

+18%

Vantagens da equipe Anubis (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of Preasy vs CPH Wolves by the Bo3.gg Team

CPH Wolves on Anubis Analysis

CPH Wolves demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 23 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for CPH Wolves on Anubis were Fessor, who contributed 20 kills, and Tapewaare, who added 21 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 8409 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Anubis, CPH Wolves held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Preasy on Anubis Analysis

Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for Preasy, as they managed to secure 10 out of 23 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Preasy on Anubis included Beccie, who contributed 19 kills, and Skejs, who added 12 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6695 total damage, Preasy couldn't prevent CPH Wolves from securing victory on Anubis


On the defensive side of Anubis, Preasy struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comentários
Por data